Mattis, Tillerson say new war authorization legislation “not legally required”Mattis, Tillerson say new war authorization legislation “not legally required”

cbsnews.com


Read Article

BitConnect Investment Opportunity

BitConnect Investment Opportunity

Investing in BitConnect Coin and Staking

bitconnect stakingThe moment you acquire BitConnect Coin it becomes an interest bearing asset with Up to 120% return per year through PoS minting. All you have to do to earn with this method is to hold coins in your Bitconnect-QT wallet. This means anyone holding BitConnect Coin in their wallet will receive interest on their balance in return for helping maintain security of the network.Learn more. This investment option involves profiting from the rise in price over your investment time period.

Investing in BitConnect Lending

bitconnect lendingYou can invest BitConnect coin in Bitconnect lending platform exclusively from the BitConnect Dashboard. This investment option involves profiting from Bitconnect trading bot and volatility software. You will receive daily profit based on your investment option. Upon investment term completion, you will receive your capital back to take out from the bitconnect lending platform or optionally reinvest back in lending platform to continue receiving daily profit. If you wants to invest in BitConnect lending, you have to buy BitConnect Coin in the first place. Buy BitConnect coin from BCC Exchange with Bitcoins first.

Earn from BitConnect Coin trading

bitconnect tradingThis investment option can be used to profit on price fluctuation of BitConnect Coin. You can buy BitConnect coin at a lower price and selling them at higher price. You can also profiting from downward movements in BitConnect coin price by selling them at a higher price and buy them again at a lower price and pocketing the price difference. If you wants to profit from short selling, you have to own BitConnect Coin in the first place.

13 Comments

AutoModerator · November 1, 2017 at 2:02 am

As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil)

In general, be courteous to others. Attack ideas, not users. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, and other incivility violations can result in a permanent ban.

If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

***

*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Thewallmachine · November 1, 2017 at 2:07 am

It is legally required to have congress approval to declare war unless you label it a “police action.”

Thatsockmonkey · November 1, 2017 at 2:08 am

GOP has to start bombing someone with Mueller and team really hitting its stride.

SATexas1 · November 1, 2017 at 2:09 am

Congress needs to pass some more laws to further limit the potus’ ability to war

Ireallydontlikereddi · November 1, 2017 at 2:12 am

Remember when billions (if not a trillion) went missing from the Pentagon?

Nah, no one does because 9/11 happened within a week of the report.

Much the same with this. The Whitehouse will use North Korea as a distraction.

gamefaqs_astrophys · November 1, 2017 at 2:12 am

The very point that the criminal Trump administration says its not needed is further proof that it IS needed.

_pass_the_rolls_ · November 1, 2017 at 2:19 am

This picture looks very cryptic..

sthlmsoul · November 1, 2017 at 2:21 am

Is Trump looking to start blowing things up as a distraction from the Russia investigation?

BossRedRanger · November 1, 2017 at 2:23 am

“How else are we to start a war to distract from our corruption?”

FirmlyThatGuy · November 1, 2017 at 2:24 am

Thy were basically asking for no limits in conflict duration, no limits on geographical scope and no advisory role necessary before Trump launches a potential nuclear strike.

This is scary stuff.

fullofwind · November 1, 2017 at 2:39 am

Barbara Lee was mocked and maligned ever since her no vote on the AUMF as being an unpatriotic Berkley peacenik. She voted against it because this was going to happen. Every single conspirator for 9/11( except some unnamed Saudi prince that we don’t get to know) is dead. The AUMF is no longer valid. Yet we are operating in fucking Niger under its authority.

Barbara Lee is owed a lot of apologies she will never get. Time to get some Congressmen that don’t think they work for the executive branch and know what their fucking job is.

datums · November 1, 2017 at 3:11 am

Congress wrote the executive branch a blank check after 9/11. That’s just how it is.

TheScribbler01 · November 1, 2017 at 4:49 am

The AUMF should be repealed entirely. It’s just a blank check to the president for engaging in foreign military action. Unless the new authorization says “The president cannot order military force without prior express congressional approval” this is just congress continuing to give up one of its most important checks on the executive. Congresspeople want endless war, but don’t want the political consequences of voting to start more wars.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *