Not every disagreement is discrimination. And it’s wrong to use anti-discrimination laws to impose ideology on Americans

The Christian Baker Shouldn’t Have Been Sent to Court

Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard the case of the baker who won’t create cakes for gay weddings. The case shouldn’t have made it that far.


BitConnect Investment Opportunity

BitConnect Investment Opportunity

Investing in BitConnect Coin and Staking

bitconnect stakingThe moment you acquire BitConnect Coin it becomes an interest bearing asset with Up to 120% return per year through PoS minting. All you have to do to earn with this method is to hold coins in your Bitconnect-QT wallet. This means anyone holding BitConnect Coin in their wallet will receive interest on their balance in return for helping maintain security of the network.Learn more. This investment option involves profiting from the rise in price over your investment time period.

Investing in BitConnect Lending

bitconnect lendingYou can invest BitConnect coin in Bitconnect lending platform exclusively from the BitConnect Dashboard. This investment option involves profiting from Bitconnect trading bot and volatility software. You will receive daily profit based on your investment option. Upon investment term completion, you will receive your capital back to take out from the bitconnect lending platform or optionally reinvest back in lending platform to continue receiving daily profit. If you wants to invest in BitConnect lending, you have to buy BitConnect Coin in the first place. Buy BitConnect coin from BCC Exchange with Bitcoins first.

Earn from BitConnect Coin trading

bitconnect tradingThis investment option can be used to profit on price fluctuation of BitConnect Coin. You can buy BitConnect coin at a lower price and selling them at higher price. You can also profiting from downward movements in BitConnect coin price by selling them at a higher price and buy them again at a lower price and pocketing the price difference. If you wants to profit from short selling, you have to own BitConnect Coin in the first place.


Chris Dyckman · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

I’m not religious and can honestly say, I would bake a cake for anyone. Money is money. I do however, respect a private business owners right not to serve anyone he chooses.

Peter Hague · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

I listened to the recording of the gay guy who was actually crying and sobbing over this. This is rediculous. Any business owner should have the right to accept or refuse service to anyone he or she chooses.

Jim Czyzewicz · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

I’m curious, would the Left have been so anxious to do this if a Muslim baker refused to make a cake with a picture of Mohammad on it or refused to sell a cake for a Jewish wedding?

Courtney Pickle · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

I don’t see how this is different from refusing to bake a wedding cake for an interracial couple. If you’re willing to provide a specific service to one group of people, but not another, is that not illegal according to Colorado law?

Ed Terrazas · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

This should have never gone to court. There were plenty of other shops able and willing to bake the stupid cake. This is another, in your face move by gay activist to force their values on others. To normalize the abnormal.

Greg Vaughn · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

Restaurants can have “dress codes” ? Hotels can deny “concealed carry” ? Bartenders can refuse to “serve” some one who “””appears””” ? Drunk ?
High School softball teams can deny boys participation? CatholicChurches can deny non-Catholics the Sacrament of Communion? Obviously, I could go on forever….. but if a non-government funded business can’t choose to whom they offer their services or products…… what’s next?

Will Rusch · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

Good article but I disagree. This is exactly the type of case that should be heard at the Supreme Court. We’re are a point where we need a ruling on whether sexual orientation is to be included in or excluded from federal discrimination protections.

Gordon Cummings · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

The gay couple were free to decide whether they wanted to do business with the Christian baker or not. He should have the same freedom.

Roy Van · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

Maybe they should find a gay baker to make there cake or a baker who has no problem with it. No. They wanted to make a political statement. Even at the expense of ruining a mans livelihood. And I wonder who finally made the cake. It seems to me they want to “have there cake and eat it too.”

Benjamin Lumen · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

I thought that was why Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, and Equal Rights legislation was written so broadly in the first place… so that they could exactly use them to do what they are doing with them…

Kevin Bresnahan · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

Actually, this was a simple problem to solve.
Any business open to the public should serve the public or don’t open a business in the first place.

Lynette Anderson · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

On a similar note … A few years ago, Curves was forced to take the phrase “for women” off their signs to avoid a law suit. To this day I’ve never heard of a man joining Curves. It was all just to make a point. Why the big deal about a gym that wants to just serve women?

Cliff Garrison · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

The bakers in Oregon and florist in Washington should not have had to pay fines and end up losing their businesses, either.

James Lane · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

When you decide to start a business to serve the public at large then you leave your personal beliefs at home.

No one forced him to open a business and anti discrimination laws have been held as Constitutional.

People are forgetting that this baker openly admits he welcomes the LGBTQ community to his establishment. If he’s willing to sell them cookies then he can bake a cake for them. His product is not an endorsement.

Pete Shultz · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

Funny thing is, the SCOTUS has no delegated jurisdiction, or authority, in this case and most cases… “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;–to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;–to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;–to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;–to controversies between two or more states;–between a state and citizens of another state;–between citizens of different states;–between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.” ~ Article 3, Sec. 2 of The U.S. Constitution..

Bill Yazel · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

The gay couple drove over 120 miles to get to this baker. Wonder how many other bakers they passed to get to his store. I bet 60+ and even passed by some Muslim bakers. Isn’t it nice that the Liberals go out of thier way to screw up this country?

Ryan Louis · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

People need to read unbiased articles about this. The man will bake for gay people but he doesn’t want to do a gay themed wedding cake. I don’t see anything wrong with that, it’s his business, he’s an artist, and he will make a cake for anyone but won’t do a cake that celebrates gay marriage because it’s his religious belief that gay marriage goes against God. To force him to bake a cake or possibly shut him down over it is literally lunacy. It’s truly no wonder why Trump won the presidency.

Jay Todd · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

Liberals have no qualms stifling liberty and ruining those who disagree. Now someone on the Left might call the above sentence over-hyped rhetoric. However, we are all living through the proof of that charge, with the evidence of what Colorado lower courts and boards did to this man, the numerous death threats he’s since received, and how the Washington State AG attempted to persoanlly ruin the florist, with the similar case, in WA State. The politics of ruination. 😣

Forrest Pruett · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

You mean there was no some gay baker they could of given their business to? Went out of their way to hurt someone. Bible study in gay coffee shop the next thing

Scott Smith · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

The market forces should decide whether the baker did the right thing or not. If he refuses to bake a wedding cake for a homosexual couple then a bunch of people get offended by that and they choose not to do business with him he’ll lose his business and somebody will come in and buy it up and they’ll make cakes for people. This is not a legal issue or should not be rather I don’t mean it’s not. It should not be an issue for the courts.

Michelle Strawbridge · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

The two gay guys knew when they walked into that bakery, exactly what they would be doing and it had NOTHING to do with a cake.

Scott Parker · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

I would have made them a cake…. I didn’t say how good the cake was going to be, or how much it cost. We’re always in control.

Michael Thomas · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

Amen. The sooner Conservatives understand that the only thing that the liberal ideology actually promotes is it’s self interest in dominating the U.S. political system through the use of the United States Judicial system to force Americans to accept their ideological mandates as the law. AKA – Fascism

Louis C Carl · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

Let’s put this in terms lefties can understand: The guy who killed Cecil the lion decides to invite all his buddies for a big soiree celebrating taking the beast and asks you to employ your artistic skills towards creating a special confection for the grand celebration – How do you respond ?

Debbie Hill · December 8, 2017 at 9:28 am

We believe marriage is a sacrament. It is between a man and a woman. We are not anti gay. They just can’t receive the sacrament. Most of us can’t receive ALL the sacraments!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *